Media freedom in the country is in decline against a backdrop of new restrictive laws, hostile rhetoric and denigration of journalists by public officials, and ongoing systemic challenges to the independence of public service media, said a report by he Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), a mechanism that tracks, monitors and reacts to violations of press and media freedom in EU member states and candidate countries.

“While the country had long experienced a stagnation in its progress for freedom of the media and freedom of expression, the situation has seen an overall decline, even as the country was granted candidate status for accession to the European Union in December 2022. The MFRR organisations express their greatest solidarity with the journalists and media outlets who are working in a suffocating environment and poor working conditions,” according to the MFRR report that followed a press freedom mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina from 22-25 October.

During the three-day mission, the delegation met with a number of political and media stakeholders both in Banja Luka, Republika Srpska (RS), and in Sarajevo, expressing regret that RS President Milorad Dodik “did not respond to our requests for a meeting.”

Package of restrictive laws

The delegation closely examined the package of restrictive laws that have been passed or are currently in development or discussions in RS, where entity president Dodik is “steadily tightening the screws on independent media and civil society organisations.”

They recalled of recently adopted law changes that reintroduced criminalisation of defamation, with a comment that this legislation is modelled on similar problematic laws from around Europe, but its impact in RS is “exacerbated by broader lack of independence of the judiciary and prosecutors.”

“Although the final text of the law was an improvement on the initial draft, the end result remains in violation of international human rights standards. The delegation welcomes the commitment given by the President of the RS National Assembly to conduct a review of the law one year after its passing to assess its impact on journalists,” said the report.

As for the so-called ‘foreign agents’ law, which has passed the first vote within the National Assembly, if ultimately adopted, the legislation would require nonprofit organisations funded from abroad and active in the Bosnian Serb entity to register and report on their work.

“Media NGOs, which enjoy greater independence under this status, are targeted by this legislation, which is designed to stigmatise and further burden them with financial and administrative reporting,” the MFRR warned.

The delegation was also informed of a third legal initiative to develop a new media law in RS, which they assessed is being conducted in a “non-transparent process with no proper structure or appointment procedure for the working group, posing questions over its legitimacy.”

“This package of interlinked legislation is aimed at further stifling the space for critical reporting and is contributing to a wider atmosphere of pressure and isolation amongst the journalistic community in Republika Srpska. When viewed together, the laws pose an existential threat to the future of independent journalism in RS,” the report stressed.

At the Sarajevo canton level, meanwhile, a new draft law ‘on Public Order and Peace’ would empower the police to sanction anyone spreading “fake news” including online.

“This law expands the definition of a public place to the internet. We urge the authorities to withdraw this dangerous piece of legislation, which includes vague definitions which would leave the door wide open to abuses and seriously undermine freedom of expression,” the association warned.

Safety of journalists

As for the safety of journalists, the mission met with several journalists who have been attacked because of their work, in both Banja Luka and Sarajevo. Many of the investigations into these attacks have still not been completed, mirroring a wider trend. According to the BH Journalists Association, only 25% of the cases involving journalists in the whole BH have been investigated and the rate of prosecutions remains problematic.

It was emphasised that the physical attacks are relatively rare, while verbal attacks and insults directed towards journalists by prominent politicians remain a concern. The mission assessed that hostility and harsh rhetoric against journalists sends a signal to the public that journalists are legitimate targets of violence and scapegoats.

They welcomed the work of the Free Media Help Line of the BH Journalists Association and its positive impact, urging for the establishment of contact points within all police and prosecutors offices as a welcome step forward.

“The establishment of a standing working group for the safety of journalists is the next step for creating an integrated institutional response, and we welcome the commitment of the Main Prosecutor in Canton Sarajevo to participate in such a body,” the document said.

Regulatory framework and public service media

A special attention was drawn to the public broadcaster, Radio and Television of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BHRT), which, according to the report, remains “locked in a period of perennial crisis due to the blocked access to legally mandated lice fee funding and the lack of a sustainable funding model, undermining its institutional stability and independence.” It was recalled that the appointment of a new director general continues to be blocked, along with the appointment of a new management council.

As for the independence of the national Communication Regulatory Agency (RAK), the report said that it continues to be undermined by the politicised appointments of its director and the non-appointment of its management council, while the selective approach of regulatory actions by the Agency have raised concerns, though these problematic decisions remain rare.

The MFRR warned that the legal framework for freedom of access to information has been weakened due to recent legislative changes, providing public authorities more opportunities to deny the release of data, adding onerous new hurdles for journalists, and undermining transparency.

The crucial role of international community

Journalists and civil society organisations representatives who met the MFRR delegation during the past two days said they expected more from the international community. The mission heard repeated concerns that in the process of ticking boxes for the progress of the country towards accession to the EU, media freedom risks being overlooked for considerations such as stability and security.

“Given the fears that the situation in Republika Srpska will spill over the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, we urge international organisations to unify positions, use their diplomatic leverage to defend media freedom in the whole country and always stand in solidarity with journalists and media outlets. We call on the EU delegation to make media freedom and freedom of expression a high priority in the accession negotiations”, the report said.

The delegation was composed of ARTICLE 19 Europe, the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ), Free Press Unlimited (FPU), the International Press Institute (IPI), the Osservatorio Balcani Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT), as well as South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO) and was supported by the BH Novinari association.